User talk:Jimfbleak
Deletion review for Draft:Chen Haiyan
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Draft:Chen Haiyan. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.--1233 ( T / C） 16:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Anant Jamloki
[edit]- @1233 I only want to keep my old articles safe in which I have written true information and these articles have been written by me myself. Now I am not able to understand why efforts are being made to remove them after 3 years. Thank you. Anant Jamloki (talk) 10:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Anant Jamloki, your user page is for you to write about your activities on Wikipedia, so anything else will be deleted. Your article had no in-line independent verifiable sources, no wikilinks, and the text is highly promotional, culminating in enhancing its beauty even more. Further uphill lies a picturesque lake called Nagtal, whose beauty is beyond description. If you post an article, it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. I don't understand efforts are being made to remove them after 3 years. Your account is only a year old and your user page and article were both started in 2025 Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- I only wrote what is true and my account is 3 years old, that is a different matter, I might have used it for English later. Anant Jamloki (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Anant Jamloki, whether it is true is irrelevant, we must be able to verify with in-line independent verifiable sources, and some of it was your opinions rather than verifiable facts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- If I do references then will the page remain in good condition? Anant Jamloki (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Anant Jamloki, whether it is true is irrelevant, we must be able to verify with in-line independent verifiable sources, and some of it was your opinions rather than verifiable facts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- I only wrote what is true and my account is 3 years old, that is a different matter, I might have used it for English later. Anant Jamloki (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Anant Jamloki, your user page is for you to write about your activities on Wikipedia, so anything else will be deleted. Your article had no in-line independent verifiable sources, no wikilinks, and the text is highly promotional, culminating in enhancing its beauty even more. Further uphill lies a picturesque lake called Nagtal, whose beauty is beyond description. If you post an article, it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. I don't understand efforts are being made to remove them after 3 years. Your account is only a year old and your user page and article were both started in 2025 Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Anant Jamloki, make sure your refs are in-line, formatted (not bare urls) and independent of the temple, also avoid opinions such as those mentioned above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- thanks 👍 Anant Jamloki (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Anant Jamloki, make sure your refs are in-line, formatted (not bare urls) and independent of the temple, also avoid opinions such as those mentioned above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Aygun Badalova
[edit]Hi, I’m new and I’ve created a draft for Aygun Badalova (I’ve disclosed a conflict of interest on my user page). I’d really appreciate any feedback on how to improve it or help it meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Thanks so much! Draygun (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Philip Hendry
[edit]Hi Jimfbleak, I saw that you previously deleted the draft of the OpenUp article under G11 for promotional content. I’m currently working on a new version and I want to make sure it follows Wikipedia’s guidelines for neutrality, sourcing, and notability. Could you kindly advise me on what specific improvements or changes are needed to make this page acceptable for publication? I really want to get it right and would appreciate your guidance. Thanks in advance!
Deletion of Draft:Louis Armstrong Middle School
[edit]I have seen that you reviewed my draft of the Louis Armstrong Middle School. The purpose of this article was to inform readers about the school. In no way was I attempting to advertise the school. Example are with several high schools with wikipedia articles, that have the same sort of content. Schoolwikiwriter69 (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Schoolwikiwriter69 no in-line references to independent third-party sources, no wikilinks, plenty of fact-free promotional claims The school's mission is to bring together a culturally diverse group of students to help them grow academically, emotionally, socially, and physically... to promote racial integration and diversity in education. The school embodies the philosophy that children learn best when they have classmates from different ethnic groups, neighborhoods, and academic abilities. The student body reflects the diversity of Queens,... a robust curriculum... It is known for its accelerated and honors programs... The school has received recognition for its music education program and looks as if it's written by a LLM Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)